FBI Assistant Director Tom Fuentes admitted he could not explain why law enforcement officers in the Christopher Dorner manhunt were overheard on police scanners yelling “burn it down.”
A Former FBI Assistant Director said he did not know how to respond to recordings of police officers yelling “burn it down” over the radio during the raid on the cabin where fugitive Christopher Dorner was thought to have been burned alive, suggesting that the voices may not have been those of SWAT officers on the scene.
Interviewed on CNN yesterday, Tom Fuentes admitted he was at a loss to explain why the audio, extracted from police scanners, contained such panicked yelling.
“In a SWAT operation, they’re highly disciplined, highly professional. There’s not going to be that kind of shouting and, of course, the terminology, “burn it down”, and things like that. So, I just don’t — it doesn’t fit what I’m normally used to in an operation this difficult.” Fuentes said.
“You wouldn’t hear comments like that, so I just don’t know… the sheriff’s department’s going to have a lot of questions to answer about who was making those statements on the radio and why.” Fuentes added, insinuating that he believes the words may not have come from responding officers.
As we have reported, audio recorded from online police scanners, before they were disabled, contains innumerable examples of police discussing a plan to intentionally “burn down” the cabin before incendiary CS gas was thrown in.
CNN anchor Ashleigh Banfield repeated some of the startling words heard on the audio; “most of the words I can’t say, so I’m going to have to make my way through this.” Banfield stated before listing the quotes, “Burn that smoke grenade out. Burn that “f’ing” house down. Going to burn it down. Get it going right now. “F’ing” burn this mother f’er.” more
just another bunch of murdering, lying cops, just like the fbi
With the audio of the cops intentionally burning the house down around Dorner available to everyone, why do they choose to tell blatant lies and say it wasn’t intentional? By doing this they justified everything Dorner did. Why do “good cops” let this happen if Dorner wasn’t telling the truth? You cross the blue wall of silence and we will murder you with impunity, got the message? You stay classy, cops.
This clearly appears to be a case of arson and manslaughter, to say the least, more likely a case of premeditated arson and murder! And the perpetrators were law enforcement officers! Now, if that doesn’t scare you, I don’t know what would! Anybody remember the Philadelphia case in 1985?! The massacre at Mount Carmel in 1993? Remember the motivation for the Timothy McVey Oklahoma City bombing attack? I’m telling you, I’m beginning to understand the – albeit irrational – reasoning of people for keeping their assault rifles!!
possibly even further than that. possibly a crazy completely fake scenario to somehow affect public reactions or to test them perhaps… Or they toched some one who knew something they didnt want out. but theres quieter ways of getting rid of someone with information so …. ive sat through all the new recently imagining ‘if they are aware of how silly a lot of this is and arent as ‘normal’ (asleep) and realise people are noticing more nowadays’ then theres a BIGGER picture to all these … distractions. its just a theory, a thought experiment. a ‘well, if they thought this way or knew this. how woudl they act’. I thought yesterday, its the reason they made the ‘illuminati card game’ to play with what could happen and what may happen if you introduced certain scenarios. Its a thought expriement really and these are used all the time to theorise..
check youtube police scanner recording …they talked about burning long before the fire, it was the plan all along. and they said that his ID was found so now paper do’nt burn CUMON MAN they said His ID was found earlier so what he left ID twice ?
check youtube police scanner recording …they talked about burning long before the fire, it was the plan all along. and they said that his ID was found so now paper do’nt burn CUMON MAN they said His ID was found earlier so what he left ID twice ?
The tape doesn’t lie. The official explanation is a clear example of doublespeak.
Disgusting coproaches lie every chance they get.